Appraisal Management Survey Sheds Light on Industry Propaganda
Coester Appraisal Group, a nationwide appraisal management company releases its
annual appraisal industry survey. Over 1,559 licensed and certified appraisers
completed the survey with the results shedding some insight into the appraisal
industry and what is really happening in the appraisal industry. The data was collected
directly from appraisers via SurveyMonkey, various websites, press releases and e‐mail.
After further analysis of the data from the Annual Coester Appraisal Group Vendor
Survey, it seems like many of the implications made regarding the state of the mortgage
industry as a whole have been debunked.
FINDINGS
A total of 1,569 appraisers completed the survey, with a majority of appraisers licensed
in one state and some as many as seven. Appraisers in all 50 states are represented in
the survey.
Distance – One‐third of respondents traveled an average of 15‐20 miles from the
appraiser’s place of business to an assignment with an additional 31.4% traveling 10‐15
miles. This is consistent with the TAVMA survey that indicated the average travel
distance for an appraiser is 13 miles ( TAVMA Survey can be found on their
website)
Response Time – As shown in Exhibit 1 and 1A, the average turnaround time of 2‐3 days
from assignment for a Conventional 1004/1073 and 4‐5 days from receipt of the order. This was consistent regardless of it was completed by an apraisal management company or directly to an appraiser.
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 1A
Fees ‐ Contrary to mainstream data reports, 64.65% of appraisers charge the same
amount whether contacted through an AMC or directly by the lender. Fees on
Conventional and FHA 1004/1073 appraisals ranged $350‐$450. One of the more
popular misconceptions in the industry is that AMC’s earn a huge margin by paying
appraisers $150‐$200 while charging the borrower $450‐$500. Our data proves this
wrong, showing that although appraisers quote lenders $350‐$450 for appraisals, they
net $250‐$300 for a Conventional appraisal and $300‐$350 for an FHA report. This
translates into appraisers receiving over 70% – 80% of their original quoted fee and the AMC
retaining the other 30% or 30 cents on the dollar.
Though many may not agree with the changes that the Home Valuation Code of
Conduct (“HVCC”) has brought to the industry including the proliferation of AMC’s,
71.1% of appraisers work for one or more appraisal management companies. This
appears to be a necessary “evil” in order to continue their career and livelihood. The
top AMC’s noted in the survey results are LSI (22.8%), Landsafe (19%), RELS Valuation
(27.59%), Quantrix (16.1%), Solidifi (6.9%), Appraisal Port (11.5%) and Coester Appraisal
Group (5.2%).
Overall, appraisers rate their AMC experience as simply “average.” The demand of
quick turn times coupled with reduced fees were prominently cited for the average
rating. Another reason was the abundance of report stips. The currently lending
environment can, of course, be the counter argument to the last point.
Payment ‐ A considerable number of comments regarding slow pay from AMC’s and
lenders alike were a revealed where 36.9% of appraisers would like to be compensated
on a net 15 payment schedule and 35.4% of appraisers preferring a direct deposit
method of payment. As a result of this survey, while Coester Appraisal Group currently
pays on a net 30 basis, we are currently making improvements to offer direct deposit to our vendors.
General Feedback ‐ The most prevalent feedback on AMC’s pertained to reduced or set
fees. Other concerns that ranked very high on the list are as follows:
1) Turnaround time expectations and pressure‐ Numerous appraisers state that this
is one of their main concerns (besides fees) when it comes to working with
AMC’s. They say that despite the enforcement of the HVCC, they still get
pressured from unknowledgeable staff to get the appraisal submitted
immediately. Appraisers feel as if AMC’s do not have staff members that are not
trained or licensed appraisers, therefore they are not aware of all the factors and
research that go into composing an appraisal report, especially in a rural area.
2) Too much follow‐up‐Appraisers feel that the time they spend answering phone
calls from AMC’s regarding status updates could be used doing more productive
things such as composing reports, doing inspections, etc. Although there are
some companies that may be a little excessive with checking on the status of a
report, but this topic is a double edged sword because there are plenty of
appraisers that do not take any initiative to call the AMC with an update before
they get the chance to call them. To be honest, the calls will stop when
appraisers start being proactive rather than reactive when it comes to the status
of a report. When AMC’s do not know what is going on with their files and the
lender is questioning their competency and reliability, it appears very
unprofessional, so phone calls must be made to the appraiser until an answer is
provided. Period.
3) Better communication‐ Respondents state that when it comes to getting
answers to questions from AMC’s, it definitely needs improvement. They are
disturbed about the fact that these companies expect them to answer questions
immediately, however when it comes to getting an inquiry response that is
imperative to the appraisal process, it is impossible to reach a staff member or
they reach someone who cannot speak proper English.
4) Lack of appraisal expertise/uneducated personnel‐As previously mentioned,
appraisers feel as if a majority of the staff is not competent when it comes to the
appraisal process, especially those that are in the review department. They feel
as if their appraisal reports are solely rated on a “checkbox” scale that AMC staff
is trained to use and that is the extent of their expertise.
5) Unfair/Non‐existence of rotation of assignments‐Appraisers are concerned with
the fact that they can never seem to get into the rotation to receive work from
AMC’s. They feel as if they are just another “fish in the sea” and no matter what
they do, appraisal management companies already have a selected pool of
appraisers that they give repeat business to.
6) Time it takes AMC’s to pay the appraisers‐Coester Appraisal Group is currently
paying appraisers on a Net 30 pay cycle. According to the data results above,
their preferred method of payment is on a Net 15 basis and some appraisers
report payment delivery times of six months after being quoted otherwise.
7) Broadcasting of Appraisal Orders‐Respondents also seem to be disappointed
with some of the methods used to assign appraisal orders, a main concern being
an appraisal “broadcast.” This is when a mass e‐mail is sent out to every
appraiser that services the subject area and the first one to respond to it gets to
complete the order. Appraisers feel as if this is the most impersonal way to do
business because you are not getting to know your vendors at all and some
appraisers even refuse to work with companies that choose to broadcast their
orders.
Global Disclaimer
Coester Appraisal Group specifically prohibits the redistribution of this material in whole or in part
without the written permission of Coester Appraisal Group and Coester Appraisal Group accepts no
liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.






